The Role of Communications in Public Management Policy Implementation Carried Out by Agriculture Sustainable Development

Abstract

The article examines the basic concepts of sustainable development, identifies the current state of the agricultural sector and presents its characteristics and factors constraining its balanced development in Ukraine. Based on the analysis of world experience, it was established that the issues of effective public administration are extremely important in ensuring the sustainable development of the agrosphere, especially in the context of decentralization of power in which with most of management functions are transferred from central to local authorities. In these conditions, the need to use effective public administration technologies, with communications playing a key role, has been proven. The paper suggests a system of organizational and economic activities aimed to ensure the sustainable development of the agrosphere, among which the resource balance is singled out. The latter includes three main balance – subsystems, namely balance in resource potential reproduction; resource and technological balance; balance in using resource potential. It provides: - ensuring structural proportionality between material and technical, labor, land and other resources used in the process of agricultural production and meets the needs in overall scope; - selection of resources considering the peculiarities of modern technologies and climatic conditions; - economical use of available resources, which provides for their combination into a single production process that provides high resource efficiency and maintains a dynamic balance between all components of the biosphere. The role and place of foresight in the formation and implementation of sustainable development policy based on reconciling the interests of all stakeholders, especially elites, building consensus on the future for society as a whole and was grounded. The reconciling provides a choice of action depending on the future forecasting and ways to achieve it, as well as shows possible ways to adjust them. The paper reveals the analysis of the survey conducted amongst private farmers (according to a multifactor questionnaire in which the answers for each statement ranged from 0 - strongly disagree, to 4) on the most constraining factors in establishing communication between private farmers and public authorities. It was found out that the most influential ones included distrust of public authorities, misunderstanding of communication processes and tools as well as a lack of desire to communicate, It is proved that large-scale information and consulting activities, as an organized exchange of information, should be implemented through the strengthening of communication links between public authorities, private farmers, community, academicians and other business entities as well as through government support programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Sokolska, T. V. (2016). Resource and economic support for sustainable growth of agricultural production. Bila Tserkva. [in Ukrainian]
2. Age, A. I., Obinne, C. P., & Demenongu, T. S. (2012). Communication for Sustainable Rural and Agricultural Development in Benue State, Nigeria.
3. Sivak T. V. (209). Strategic communications in the system of public administration of Ukraine. Kyiv: NAPA. [in Ukrainian].
4. Borodin, M. (ed) (2012). Socioeconomic development of agriculture and village: modern dimension. NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Economics and Forecasting. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
5. Popova, O. L. (2009). Sustainable development of the agrosphere of Ukraine: policy and mechanisms. NAS of Ukraine; Inst. of Economics. and predicted. NAS of Ukraine. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
6. Shubravska, O. V. (2002). Sustainable development of agro-food system of Ukraine. Institute of Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
7. Khvesyk, M. A. (2009). Strategic imperatives of land use rationalization in the context of socio-economic rise of Ukraine. Economics of agro-industrial complex. № 3. S. 24–30. [in Ukrainian].
8. Gaidutsky, P.I. (ed) (2005). Agrarian reform in Ukraine. Kyiv : NSC IAE, [in Ukrainian].
9. Amosov, O. (2014). E-government - there is no alternative! The latest information and communication technologies in the modernization of public administration: foreign and domestic experience. Materials of the II scientific-practical. seminar. (April 25, 2014, Dnipropetrovsk). Dnipropetrovsk: DRIDU NADU, [in Ukrainian].
10. Gavkalova, N. L. Jain Pradip Kumar. Defining the role of communications in public administration. URL: http://repository.hneu.edu.ua/bitstream.
11. Habermas, Yu. (2000). Structural Transformations in the Sphere of Openness: A Study of the Civil Society Category. Lviv.
12. Dreshpak, V. M. (2013). Topology of leadership in the communicative space of the region. Management leadership: the challenges of today: count. monster. Khmelnytsky: PE Melnyk.[in Ukrainian].
13. Dreshpak, V. M. (ed). (2014). Information technologies in public administration and local self-government: practicum. Dnipropetrovsk.: DRIDU NADU, [in Ukrainian].
14. Pisotsky, V. (2013). Communicative activity of the territorial community in the process of local self-government in Ukraine. Public administration and local self-government. 4 (19). [in Ukrainian].
15. Lasswell, H. D. (2005). The Structure and Function of Communication in Society. The Communication of Ideas / ed. L. Bryson. New York: Harper and Brothers. P. 37 – 51.
16. Luhmann, N. (1996). Die Realitat der Massenmedien. Erweiterte Auflage. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag,
17. Matyushina, I. I. (2017). Two theories of communicative action: Yu. Habermas and M. Popovych. Current issues of philosophy and sociology: Scientific and practical journal. № 20. pp. 67-70. [in Ukrainian].
18. Mazur, V. G. (2020). Communications as a mechanism of interaction between state authorities and the public at the regional level. Electronic journal "Public Administration: Improvement and Development" Retrieved from http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=313 [in Ukrainian].
19. Litvinova, L. V., & Zbiranik Yu. V. (2015). Theoretical aspects of communication development in public authorities in Ukraine. Retrieved from q http://www.e-patp.academy.gov.ua/2015_2/3.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
20. Grechko,T. K., Lisovsky, S. A., Romanyuk, S. A., & Rudenko L.G. (2015). Public administration in ensuring sustainable (balanced) development. Kherson: Green DS. [in Ukrainian].
21. Martin, B. (1995). Foresight in science and technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 7(2) pp.139-168.
22. Mefalopulos P. Communication for sustainable development: applications and challenges. Retrieved from http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/ coediciones/201008240 72510/20Chapter14.pdf.
23. Babatunde, O. (2015). Importance of Effective Communication in Public Organisations. Issues in Social Science. 2015, 3(2), Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291101385_Importance_of_Effective_Communication_in_Public_Organisations. [in Russian].

Abstract views: 59
PDF Downloads: 67
Published
2021-07-09
How to Cite
Sokolska, T., Polishchuk, S., Panasyuk, V., Lobachova, S., & Osypenko, B. (2021). The Role of Communications in Public Management Policy Implementation Carried Out by Agriculture Sustainable Development. Public Administration Aspects, 9(4), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.15421/152131
Section
Article