Features of implementation of the newest management concepts: regional model of modernization of administrative processes in public authorities in conditions of digital transformation of society
AbstractIn the article emphasizes that for Ukraine in the current conditions, the desire for effective public administration necessitates the formation of a strong bureaucracy, so the administrative work of public authorities becomes a field for innovation and modernize. Emphasis is placed on the internal work of public authorities, which under the influence of the digital transformation of society requires the modernization of administrative processes taking into account digital technologies. The implementation of practices in combination with digital technologies requires research for the success of modernization in the public authorities of Ukraine, which will take into account the existing values and principles that are accepted at the international level. The article argues that in the context of digital transformation of society, public authorities of democratic countries of the modern world should a priori use in their work the principles of the newest management concepts as exemplary guidelines for action. The article provides an overview of the main provisions of the newest management concepts «New Public Management», «Good Governance», «FAST Government», «Open Government». The article considers the components of these concepts through the impact on the main levels of administrative processes taking place in public authorities. Based on the results in 2019 study of electronic readiness of Dnipropetrovsk region, a description of the regional model of modernization of administrative processes, which consists of five levels: level of infrastructure, level of interaction, level of decision support, level of access to public information and level of service provision. A graphical representation of the regional model of modernization of administrative processes in public authorities is given, indicating the impact of the latest management concepts at its level. Based on this, it is determined that the implementation of the approaches of the newest management concepts in public authorities, based on the introduction of digital technology tools, has the character of a comprehensive focus on service activities.
Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment, and Migration Working Papers. (p.189).
Ávila, L., Teixeira, L., & Almeida, P. (2015). Promotion of Administrative Modernization through Processes Dematerialization. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition (pp. 640–649).
Farazmand, A. (2018). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer. (p. 6214). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9.
Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. Farrar, Stratus and Giroux, First edition. (p. 500).
Global service delivery model for the United Nations Secretariat: report of the Secretary-General (2019). UN. Secretary-General, A/73/706, p.53. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/A/73/706.
Karpenko, O. V., Denysiuk, Zh. Z., Namestnik, V. V. et al. (2020). Tsyfrove vriaduvannia [Digital governance].
O. V. Karpenko (Ed.). Kyiv: IDEIa PRYNT [in Ukrainian].
Kvitka, S. A., & Sokolovs’ka, O. O. (2015). Elektronne vriaduvannia yak innovatsiinyi mekhanizm vzaiemodii vlady, biznesu ta hromadianskoho suspilstva: zarubizhnyi dosvid ta peredumovy rozvytku v Ukraini [E-government as an innovative mechanism of cooperation between government, business and civil society: international experience and background of development in Ukraine]. Public administration aspects, 3(9), 26-34. doi: 10.15421/151569 [in Ukrainian].
Kvitka, S., & Mazur, O. (2019). Dostup do merezhi Internet cherez mobilni prystroi: svitovyi dosvid ta perspektyvy rozvytku v Ukraini [Internet access through mobile devices: world experience and perspectives of development in Ukraine]. Public administration aspects, 7(9–10), 5–18. doi: 10.15421/151944 [in Ukrainian].
Kvitka, S., Borodin, Ye., Yemelyanov, V. & Ivashova. L. (2020). The foresight of national economy's digital development. Revista inclusiones, 7(SI), 112-–25. Retrieved from http://www.archivosrevistainclusiones.com/gallery/10%20vol%207%20num%20especialleabriljunio2020revinclusi.pdf.
Kvitka, S., Tytarenko, O., & Mazur, O. (2019). Otsinka stanu tsyfrovoho rozvytku administratyvno-terytorialnykh odynyts Dnipropetrovskoi oblasti [Evaluation of digital development of administrative and territorial units of Dnipropetrovsk region]. Public administration aspects, 7(11), 15–25. doi: 10.15421/151952 [in Ukrainian].
Lopez-Claros, A., Dahl, A., & Groff, M. (2020). Values and Principles for an Enhanced International System: Operationalizing Global “Good Governance”. Global Governance and the Emergence of Global Institutions for the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, 433-456. doi: 10.1017/9781108569293.
Measures to strengthen accountability at the United Nations: contribution made by the Department of Management to the improvement of management practices and time-bound plan for the reduction of duplication, complexity and bureaucracy in the United Nations administrative processes and procedures: report of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (2005). UN. Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions. New York, A/60/418, (p. 4). Retrieved from https://undocs.org/en/A/60/418.
Peters, B., & Pierre, J. (2016). Implementation, Administration, and Governance. Comparative Governance: Rediscovering the Functional Dimension of Governing. Cambridge University Press, 142-169. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781316681725.007.
Polini, A., Polzonetti, A., & Re, B. (2012). Formal Methods to Improve Public Administration Business Processes. RAIRO - Theoretical Informatics and Applications, 46(2), 203-229. doi:10.1051/ita/2012002.
Review of duplication, complexity and bureaucracy in United Nations administrative processes and procedures (2003) : note / by the Secretary-General. UN. Office of Internal Oversight Services. UN. Secretary-General, A/58/211, (p. 16). Retrieved from https://undocs.org/A/58/211.
Saxena, K. (1996). Re-engineering public administration in developing countries. Elsevier. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 703–711.
The Future of Governmen: Lessons Learned from around the World (2011). World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on the Future of Government. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2011/06/the-future-of-government-lessons-learned-from-around-the-world/
UN E-Government Survey (2008). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2008.
UN E-Government Survey (2014). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2014.
UN E-Government Survey (2018). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2018.
UN Global E-Government Survey (2003). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2003.
What is Good Governance? (2006). United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf.
Abstract views: 107 PDF Downloads: 134