Scientific and technological sphere as an object of state regulation: terminological and essential analysis

Keywords: scientific and technological sphere, functions of science, technology, concept, descriptor, activity, state regulation

Abstract

The aim of the research is to study and analyze modern approaches to the description of scientific and technological sphere in domestic and foreign science, to determine its essential characteristics and clarify the meaning of "scientific and technological sphere as an object of state regulation." The urgency is due to insufficient theoretical certainty of the scientific and technological sphere as an object of state regulation, which systematically combines several broad areas of activity (scientific, technical, technological, innovative), which reduces the effectiveness and efficiency of mechanisms for state regulation of generation processes, applied transformation and diffusion of knowledge in all spheres of society. The results of the study include a justification for the transformation of the role of technology in the historical process of branching out the functions of science in society. It was determined that a mixed version of institution-building in the scientific and technological sphere is being implemented in Ukraine. The illegality of the interpretation of the national innovation system as an institutional model of the scientific and technological sphere is substantiated and the structure of its main descriptors was revealed. It was substantiated that the scientific and technological sphere has a systemic nature and the signs of its systematization were given. The formulated conclusions were to determine the features of technology as an area of intersection of the main functions of science in society. It was determined that among all types of activities in the scientific and technological sphere can be distinguished basic and supporting, which form the means and processes of generating new knowledge in the form of various resources (material, financial, personnel, information, organizational, etc.) and opportunities for their use. The study clarifies the concept of "scientific and technological sphere as an object of state regulation" and identifies prospects for further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

About scientific and scientific and technical activity. № 848-VIII. (2015). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/848-19#Text [in Ukrainian].

Bazhanov, V. A. (2018). Postsovetskyi marksyzm v sovetskuiu epokhu: deiatelnostnыi podkhod k analyzu nauky [Post-Soviet Marxism in the Soviet era: an activity approach to the analysis of science]. Epystemolohyia y fylosofyia nauky – Epistemology and philosophy of science, 55 (3),137–152 [in Russian].

Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy. Akademichnyi tlumachnyi slovnyk (1970-1980) [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language. Academic Explanatory Dictionary (1970-1980)]. Retrieved from http://sum.in.ua/ [in Ukrainian].

Fetisenko, V. O. (2016). Stanovlennia mizhnarodnoho spivrobitnytstva v naukovo-tekhnichnii sferi: mizhnarodno-pravovyi aspect [Formation of international cooperation in the scientific and technical sphere: the international legal aspect]. Pravova derzhava– Rule of Law, 21, 269–275 [in Ukrainian].

Guzenko, I. Y. (2017). Osoblyvosti naukovo-tekhnichnoi polityky providnykh krain svitu v umovakh hlobalizatsii[Features of scientific and technical policy of the world's leading countries in the context of globalization]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk – Economic Bulletin, 3, 37–46 [in Ukrainian].

Kharchenko, O. S. (2015). Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm rozvytku natsionalnoi innovatsiinoi systemy [Organizational and economic mechanism of development of the national innovation system]. Extended abstract of Candidate`s thesis. Kramatorsk [in Ukrainian].

Komkov, N. I. (2003). Rol ynnovatsyi y tekhnolohyi v razvytyy ekonomyky y obshchestva[The role of innovation and technology in the development of economy and society]. Problemy prohnozyrovanyia – Forecasting problems, 3, 24–43 [in Russian].

Kononyuk, A. E. (2014). Systemolohyia. Obshchaia teoryia system. V 4-kh kn. [Systemology. General systems theory. In 4 and]. Book 1. Kiev: Education of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1960). Sochynenyia [Essays]. (Vol. 23). The second ed. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature [in Russian].

Matyushenko, I. Y. (2016). Rozrobka i vprovadzhennia konverhentnykh tekhnolohii v Ukraini v umovakh novoi promyslovoi revoliutsii: orhanizatsiia derzhavnoi pidtrymky [Development and implementation of convergent technologies in Ukraine in the new industrial revolution: the organization of state support]. Kharkiv: FOP Aleksandrova K.M.

[in Ukrainian].

On the establishment of the National Council of Ukraine for the Development of Science and Technology. № 226. (2017). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/226-2017-p#Text [in Ukrainian].

Oreshnikov, I. M., & Shkerina, T. I. (2019). Sovremennaia fylosofyia nauky: predmet, kruh problem, kontseptsyy, humanystycheskyi smysl i naznachenye [Modern philosophy of science: subject, range of problems, concepts, humanistic meaning and purpose]. Istoryia i pedahohyka estestvoznanyia – History and pedagogy of natural science, 2, 5–17

[in Russian].

Ovcharova, L. P. (2018). Aktualni trendy rozvytku naukovo-tekhnichnoi sfery v zarubizhnykh krainakh [Current trends in the development of scientific and technical sphere in foreign countries]. Suchasni problemy ekonomiky i pidpryiemnytstvo – Modern problems of economics and entrepreneurship, 21, 19–29. Retrieved from http://sb-keip.kpi.ua/article/view/124122 [in Ukrainian].

Povazhny, O. S., & Shkrabak, I.V. (2013). Stratehiia derzhavnoho upravlinnia strukturno-innovatsiinym rozvytokom terytorialnykh utvoren: instytutsiinyi aspect [Strategy of state management of structural-innovative development of territorial formations: institutional aspect]. Prometei – Prometheus, 1 (40), 16–21 [in Ukrainian].

Semenov, E.V. (2013). Nauchno-tekhnolohycheskaia sfera: sposoby predstavlenyia objekta [Scientific and technological sphere: ways of presenting the object]. Upravlenye naukoi y naukometryia – Management of Science and Scientometrics, 14, 82–98 [in Russian].

Semenov, E.V. (2019). Hosudarstvennaia nauchno-tekhnolohycheskaia polytyka v sovremennoi Rossyy: zamysel y realyzatsyy [State science and technology policy in modern Russia: design and implementation]. Upravlenye naukoi: teoryia y praktyka – Management of science: theory and practice, 1, 51–71 [in Russian].

Sharavara, O. O. (2017). Promyslova revoliutsiia yak chynnyk rozvytku suspilstva [Industrial revolution as a factor in the development of society]. Aktualni problemy filosofii ta sotsiolohii: Naukovo-praktychnyi zhurnal – Current issues of philosophy and sociology: Scientific and practical journal, 16, 154–156 [in Ukrainian].

Vashkevich, V. M. (2017). Svitohliadno-filosofski osnovy nauky i problemy demarkatsii [Worldview and philosophical foundations of science and the problems of demarcation]. Hileia: naukovyi visnyk. Filosofski nauky – Gilea: scientific bulletin. Philosophical Sciences, 125, 248–252 [in Ukrainian].


Abstract views: 45
PDF Downloads: 122
Published
2020-10-29
How to Cite
Shkrabak, I., & Nikulchev, M. (2020). Scientific and technological sphere as an object of state regulation: terminological and essential analysis. Public Administration Aspects, 8(4), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.15421/152081
Section
Article