Indicator of losses of efficiency of realization of one function of operational-service (combat) activity within the organizational-staff structure
AbstractThe article deals with the actual problem of ensuring the activity of the border unit. The author made an attempt to analyse the performance indicators for the implementation of functions of operational and service activities within the organizational and staff structure.One of the normative characteristics of the effectiveness of the implementation of the functions of the state border guard within the organizational and staff structure is the indicator of efficiency losses. In scientific work the expression of the index of losses of efficiency of realization of one function of operative-service (combat) activity within the organizational-staff structure is formed.The author has used knowledge about the application of mathematical models in order to fulfil the requirements for the reliability of the research results. Mathematical models reproduce the similarity of processes in a real system. The method of structural and functional similarity estimation was used to compare simulation results and practical tests.It is emphasized that the organizational structure is a multifaceted entity in relation to which the definition of "efficiency" is not yet accurately interpreted. It was determined that the only indicator of effectiveness in the scientific literature was not considered. At the same time, the principle of formal representation of the effectiveness of the organizational and staff structure has not yet been established.The author presented an indicator of the effectiveness of the organizational and staff structure of the border unit, which should meet the known requirements for indicators and reproduce the most important properties of the structure.As a result, it is concluded that the resulting indicator can be used in the future to analyse the consistency of the results of work performed on a given function in the organizational structure of a specific border unit.
Asherov, A. T. (1974). Model sistemy organizatsionnogo upravleniya dlya issledovaniya effektivnosti yeye funktsionirovaniya [The model of organizational management system to study the effectiveness of its functioning]. Control systems and machines, 3, 15–22 [in Russian].
Birenberg, B. M., & Adamov, B. I. (1998). Osnovnyye napravleniya razvitiya regionov Ukrainy. NAN Ukrainy [The main directions of development of the regions of Ukraine. NAS of Ukraine]. Institute of Industrial Economics. Donetsk [in Russian].
Bіluha, M. T. (2002). Metodologíya naukovikh doslídzhen [Methodology of scientific research]. Kyiv: ABU [in Ukrainian].
Wentzel, E. S. (1972). Issledovaniye operatsiy [Research operations]. Moskva: Sov. Radio [in Russian].
Wentzel, E. S. (1969). Teoriya veroyatnostey [Probability theory]. Moskva: Nauka [in Russian].
Kovalenko, I. N. (2013). Znamenitaya teorema B. A. Sevast'yanova. ["The famous theorem of B. A. Sevastyanov"]. Branching processes, random walks and related questions, Collection of articles. Dedicated to the memory of Corresponding Member of the Academy of Sciences Boris Aleksandrovich Sevastyanov. Tr. Steklov Mathematical Institute. MAIK Nauka / Interperiodika. (pp. 132–134). Moscow [in Russian].
Milner, B. Z. (2002). Teoriya organizatsii [Organization theory]. 3rd ed. Moskva: INFRA-M, XVIII [in Russian].
Shegda, A. V. (1998). Osnovy menedzhmenta [Fundamentals of management]. Kyiv: Znannya [in Russian].
Subhadeep Banik, Andrey Bogdanov, Takanori Isobe, and Martin Bjerregaard Jepsen. (2017). Analysis of software countermeasures for whitebox encryption. IACR Trans. Symmetric Cryptol., 1, 307–328 [in English].
Paul, C. Kocher, Joshua Jaffe, and Benjamin Jun. (1999). Differential power analysis. (pp. 388–397). In CRYPTO [in English].