Theoretical aspects of the civil society phenomenon
AbstractThe article analyzes idealistic views on the phenomenon of "civil society". The authors emphasize that civil society is a society of justice and civil consensus, where each citizen is guaranteed civil, political and socio-economic rights and explores the basic features (features) of civil society. First, it is a society of justice. The next major feature is civic consent, that is, the establishment of a new social order through dialogue and spiritual and political consensus.According to the authors, human rights are guaranteed in every democratically organized society, and the state claiming to be legal has no right, but is obliged in its legislation to foresee and actually guarantee by legal and other means those rights which are due to the state recognitions acquire the character of subjective legal rights. As a result of the adoption of international standards by states, the very concept of a person and in domestic law becomes legal and designates citizens of that state, as well as foreigners and stateless persons who reside in its territory. And human rights are those rights that belong to every person regardless of their nationality.The authors conclude that no sharp and insurmountable boundary can be drawn between human rights and citizens' rights. Human rights are a social category. They are formed objectively as a result of the development and improvement of social production and the system of public administration of society in the form of social opportunities to enjoy various economic, political and spiritual benefits, and exist before their state recognition. And citizens' rights are those human rights that are under the protection and protection of the state.
Byel`s`ka, T. V. (2010). Vzayemovi`dnosini organi`v publi`chnoyi vladi ta i`nstituti`v gromadyans`kogo suspi`l`stva v umovakh demokratichnogo tranzitu [Relations between public authorities and civil society institutions in the context of democratic transit]. Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Teleshin, S. O. (2010). Evolyuczi`ya i` rozvitok gromadyans`kogo suspi`l`stva v Ukrayini` ta yevroi`ntegraczi`jni` proczesi : nauk. rozrobka [Evolution and Development of Civil Society in Ukraine and European Integration Processes]. Kyiv: NADU [in Ukrainian].
Afonin, E. A., Gonyukova, L.V., & Vojtovich, R. V. (2006). Gromads`ka uchast` u tvorenni` ta zdi`jsnenni` derzhavnoyi poli`tiki [Public participation in the creation and implementation of public policy]. Kyiv : Czentr spriyannya i`nstituczi`jnomu rozvitku derzh. Sluzhbi [in Ukrainian].
Yakubovs`kij, O. P., & Butirs`ka, T. A. (2004). Derzhavna vlada i` gromadyans`ke suspi`l`stvo: sistema vzayemodi`yi : monografi`ya [State power and civil society: system of interaction]. Odesa: ORIDU NADU [in Ukrainian].
Bilokopitov, D. V. (2016). Sutni`st` gromadyans`kogo suspi`l`stva ta jogo funkczi`yi v suchasnikh umovakh [The essence of civil society and its function in modern conditions]. Aktual`nі problemi derzh. upr. : zb. nauk. pr. – Pressing problems of public administration. (No. 1 (49)), (pp. 216–223). Kharkiv: Vid-vo KharRI NADU «Magistr» [in Ukrainian].
Korniyevs`kij, O. A., & Rudenko, A. F. Osnovni` tendenczi`yi ta problemi reali`zaczi`yi «Naczi`onal`noyi strategi`yi spriyannya rozvitku gromadyans`kogo suspi`l`stva v Ukrayini` na 2016-2020 roki»: anali`tichna zapiska [Main tendencies and problems of implementation of the "National Strategy for Promoting Civil Society Development in Ukraine for 2016-2020"]. Retrieved from http://www.niss.gov.ua/content/articles/files/nac_strateg-36e4c.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Girik, M. A. (2015). Instituczionalizacziya uchasti` gromadyan u zdi`jsnenni` derzhavnogo upravli`nnya [Institutionalization of citizen participation in public administration]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian] .
Turij, O.V. (2017). Okremi` aspekti vzayemodi`yi organi`zaczi`j gromadyans`kogo suspi`l`stva z organami derzhavnoyi vladi yak faktor rozvitku gromadyans`kogo suspi`l`stva [Some aspects of the interaction of civil society organizations with public authorities as a factor of civil society development]. Derzhavne upravli`nnya: udoskonalennya ta rozvitok – Public administration, improvement and development, 8. Retrieved from http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1115 [in Ukrainian].
Kvitka, S. (2017). Global`noe grazhdanskoe obshhestvo: mezhdu naczional`ny`mi gosudarstvami i transnaczional`ny`mi korporacziyami [Global civil society: between nation states and transnational corporations]. Public administration aspects, 5 (3-4), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.15421/15201711 [in Ukrainian].
Pysmennys, I. V., & Lypovska, N. A. (2015). Hromadianskyi dialoh yak forma vzaiemodii mizh vladoiu ta suspilstvom [Civic dialogue as a form of cooperation between the authorities and society]. Public administration aspects, 3(9), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.15421/151566 [in Ukrainian].
Kant, I. (1968). Soch. [Works]. Vol. 4. Part. 2. Moskva [in Russian].
Kant, I. (1965). Metafizika nravov [The Metaphysic of Morals]. Soch.: V 6 t. – Works: In 6 vols. Vol. 4.4.2. Moskva
Gegel`, F. (1935). Soch. [Works]. Vol. 7. Moskva, Leningrad [in Russian].
Gegel`, F. (1932–1959). Filosofiya prava [The Philosophy of Right]. Sobr. soch. – Collected works.Vol. 7. Moskva
Abstract views: 199 PDF Downloads: 108