Architectonic of e-governance in the USA: conceptualisation and implementation of “e-government” initiative by president’s G.W. Bush administration
AbstractIn proposed paper the modern state and main trends of public management and public servicemodernization in the USA in the context of the “E-Government” initiative by President G.W. Bushadministration have been described. The current legal and political sources dealing with variousaspects of “E-Government” implementation in the USA has been generalised. On the basis of thereceived results “E-Government” initiative has been interpreted as important stage of developmentof e-governance in the USA in the context of solving problem of fundamentally new model of statebuilding’screation. Specifics of “E-Government” implementation by complex architectonics of sourcesaccording to valid demands of information society have been traced.In particular, it’s scientifically proven that in the USA the current trend to the convergence withcivil society as one of the main trends of the public management evolution against the background ofe-governance conception’s implementation is likely to persist.“E-government” as President G.W. Bush administration’s initiative has been substantiated as systemof government information technologies used for data provision and e-services functionality support,which leads to improvement of government agencies effectiveness and carried out in the conditionsof transformation of forms and meanings of social interaction between citizen, business and publicadministration bodies. Context of this initiative implementation in the USA has been determined:information security (cyber-security), cybercrime and emerging challenges for systems protectingState information; important mission regarding privacy and confidential information protectionin post-industrial society. Process of accumulation and sophistication of architectonics of sources(doctrinal, legal, political etc) relating to “E-government” initiative in the USA corresponds withphases of conceptual emergence of e-governance model surrounding the core architectonic principle –principle of convergence between civil society, business and the State.
Arbuzov, S.H., Kolobov, Yu.V., Mishchenko, V.I. &Naumenkova, S.V. (2011). Bankivska entsyklopediia [Banking Encyclopedia]. Kyiv: Tsentr naukovykh doslidzhen Natsionalnoho banku Ukrainy, Znannia [in Ukrainian].
Bell, D. (2004). Gryadushchee postindustrialnoe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsialnogo prognozirovaniya [The coming of post-industrial society: A venture of social forecasting]. Moscow: Academia [in Russian].
Vlasov, V.G. (1993). Illyustrirovannyy khudozhestvennyy slovar [Illustrated Art Dictionary]. Saint-Petersburg: Ikar [in Russian].
Radchenko ,P., Soboleva, T., Bernykova, O., Kuryliuk, D., Stadnik, V., Smetanin, S., Zhmerenetskyi, O. (2011). Instytutsiini ta orhanizatsiini zasady vprovadzhennia elektronnoho uriaduvannia: krashchi zarubizhni praktyky [Institutional and Organizational Framework for E-Governance: Best Foreign Practices]. In S.A. Chukut, O.V. Zahvoiska (Eds). Kyiv: NADU. Retrieved from http://ktpu.kpi.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Institutsijni-ta-organizatsijni-zasadi-vprovadzhennya-e_uryaduvannya.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Alferova, Ye.V., Bachilo, I.L., Semiletov, S.I. (2010). Informatsionnye tekhnologii: innovatsii v gosudarstvennom upravlenii: Sb. nauch. trudov [Information technology: innovations in public administration]. Moscow: RAN [in Russian].
Kovbasiuk, Yu. V., Vashchenko, K. O., Surmin, Yu. P. (2013). Modernizatsiia derzhavnoho upravlinnia ta yevropeiska intehratsiia Ukrainy : nauk. dop [Public Administration Modernization and European Integration of Ukraine]. In Yu. V. Kovbasiuka (Ed.). Kyiv: NADU [in Ukrainian].
Antonova, A.V., Borodin, Ye.I., Botvinov, R.H., Vashchenko, K.O., Lypovska, N.A., Pysmennyi, I.V., Serohin, S.M., Sorokina, N.H., ... Shpektorenko, I.V. (2017). Publichna sluzhba: systemna paradyhma: kol. monohraf [Public service: a systemic paradigm]. In S.M. Serohin (Ed.). Public Administration Modernization and European Integration of Ukraine. Dnipro: DRIDU NADU [in Ukrainian].
Stratehiia reformuvannia derzhavnoho upravlinnia Ukrainy na 2016–2020 roky: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 24 chervnia 2016 r. N 474-p [Strategy of reforming the public administration of Ukraine for 2016–2020: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of June 24, 2016 No. 474-p]. Retrieved from: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/474-2016-%D1%80/print1481047961954255 [in Ukrainian].
Bezes, Ph., Jeannot, G. (2013). Public Sector Reform in France: Views and Experiences from Senior Executives. Coordination for Cohesion in the Public Sector of the Future (COCOPS): www.cocops.eu.
Centeno, C., Van Bavel, R., Burgelman, J. (2005). A prospective view of e-government in the European Union. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3 (2), 59-66. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228587398_A_prospective_view_of_e-government_in_the_European_Union.
Cook E., Meghan. (2000). What Citizens Want From E-Government. Current Practice Research. Center for Technology in Government University at Albany, SUNY. Retrieved from: https://www.ctg.albany.edu/media/pubs/pdfs/what_citizens_want.pdf.
Demmke, Ch. (2010). Civil Services in the EU of 27 – Reform Outcomes and the Future of the Civil Service. EIPASCOPE, 2, 5-11. Retrieved from: http://aei.pitt.edu/29755/1/20101022095936_Eipascope_2010_2_Article1.pdf.
E-Government Act of 2002. Public law 107–347 (2002). 116 STAT. 2899. Retrieved from: https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ347/PLAW-107publ347.pdf.
Fountain, J.E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
General Services Administration (GSA). (2019). Chief Information Officers Council (CIOC). Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://www.gsa.gov/about-us/organization/office-of-governmentwide-policy/office-of-shared-solutions-and-performance-improvement/chief-information-officers-council-cioc.
Hart D., Peter. (2001). Council for Excellence in Government: E-Government: The Next American Revolution.
Leigh, A. & Atkinson, R.D. (2001). Breaking Down Bureaucratic Barriers. The Next Phase of Digital Government. Washington, D.C.: Progressive Policy Institute. Retrieved from: http://andrewleigh.org/pdf/Digital%20government%20report%20(PPI).pdf.
Machlup, F. (2014). Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution and Economic Significance. Vol. I: Knowledge and Knowledge Production. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Masuda, Y. (1980). The Information Society as Post-Industrial Society. Transaction Publishers.
Office of E-Government & Information Technology (2019). Office of Management and Budget. Reports and Documents Resources. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/management/egov/#B2.
Pollitt, Ch., Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rossel, P., Finger, M. (2007). Conceptualizing e-Governance. ICEGOV '07 Proceedings of the 1st international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance. Macao, China. December 10–13, 399-407. Retrieved from: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1328141.
Seifert, J. W. (2002). Government information technology management: Past and future issues (The Clinger-Cohen Act) (Congressional Research Service Report RL30661). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Seifert, J., Chung, J. (2009). Using E-Government to Reinforce Government–Citizen Relationships. Comparing Government Reform in the United States and China. Social Science Computer Review, Volume 27, Number 1, 3-23. Retrieved from: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan043654.pdf.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2001, July 18). Citizen-Centered E-Government: Developing the Action Plan (OMB Memorandum M-01-28). Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/2001-M-01-28-Citizen-Centered-E-Government-Developing-the-Action-Plan.pdf.
U.S. Office of the Vice President. (1993). From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better & Costs Less. Report of the National Performance Review. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED384294.pdf.
The White House. (1999). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies, electronic government. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/WCPD-1999-12-27/pdf/WCPD-1999-12-27-Pg2641.pdf.
The White House. (1999). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies, the Use of Information Technology to Improve our Society. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/WCPD-1999-12-27/pdf/WCPD-1999-12-27-Pg2639.pdf.
The White House. (2002). The President’s management agenda. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/omb/budget/fy2002/mgmt.pdf.