Global civil society: between nation states and transnational corporations

  • S. A. Kvitka Dnipropetrovsk regional institute of public administration of National academy for public administration under the President of Ukraine
Keywords: global civil society, globalization, civil society, multinational corporations, the board without a government, NGOs, supra formation


Global civil society is the subject of the formation of a new world order and the modern humanitarian outlook, which is based on the primacy of justice and human rights. One of the actors head of global civil society is an international non-governmental organizations. But wrong to equate global civil society with the activities of these organizations only. Mostly they influence governments and their humanitarian and international politics. Meanwhile, the role of global civil and its society various institutions is much greater and significant. The article discusses the various aspects of the civil society from the position that it took place between transnational companies (TNCs) and nation-states. The role of the latter is gradually reduced - economic regulation take on multinationals and public administration is a field of activity of various institutions and structures that scientists considered it as a manifestation of global civil society. In Ukraine, which is also involved in the process of globalization, global civil society is one of the main factors of its national civil society.


1. Bebik, V., 2006. Global`ne gromadyanske suspilstvo: teoriya, metodologiya, menedzhment [Global civil society: theory, methodology, management]. Politichniy menedzhment 2, 140-147 (in Ukrainian).
2. Bek, U., 2001. Chto takoe globalizatsiya?: Oshibki globalizma — otvetyi na globalizatsiyu [What is globalization?: The mistakes of globalism - the answers to globalization]. Moscow, 148 (in Russian).
3. Buryak, V. V. Grazhdanskoe obschestvo v epohu globalnyih transformatsii [Civil society in the era of global transformations]. Аccess: http://sn-philcultpolsoc. crimea. edu/arhiv/2012/fil_24_3/004_buryak. Pdf (in Russian).
4. Vojtovy‌ch, R.V., 2005. Global‌ne suspil‌stvo yak nova forma social‌noyi organizaciyi u suchasny‌x umovax [Global society as a new form of social organization in modern conditions]. Derzhavne upravlinnya: teoriya ta prakty‌ka 2, 2005-2 (in Ukrainian).
5. Gaynutdinov, R.I., 2006. Osobaya missiya globalnogo grazhdanskogo obschestva [A special mission of global civil society]. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe i publichnoe pravo. Periodicheskoe nauchnoe izdanie 5. Moscow, Izd. gruppa «Yurist» (in Russian).
6. Gaynutdinova, L.A., 2010. Oslablenie gosudarstva i grazhdanskoe obschestvo v usloviyah globalizatsii [Weakening of the state and civil society in the context of globalization]. Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS 6, 243-254 (in Russian).
7. Giddens, E., 2011. Posledstviya sovremennosti [Consequences of modernity]. Moscow, Praksis, 343. ISBN 978-59015-7490-4 (in Russian).
8. Karas‌, A., 2003. Filosofiya gromadyans‌kogo suspil‌stva v klasy‌chny‌x teoriyax i neklasy‌chny‌x interpretaciyax [The philosophy of civil society in the classical and non-classical theories of interpretation]. Ky‌ïv; L‌viv: Vy‌davny‌chy‌y‌̆ centr LNU imeni Ivana Franka, 520 (in Ukrainian).
9. Kin, Dzh., 2001. Demokratiya i grazhdanskoe obschestvo [Democracy and civil society]. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya, 400 (in Russian).
10. Koen, Dzhin, L., Arato, Endryu, 2003.. Grazhdanskoe obschestvo i politicheskaya teoriya [Civil society and political theory]. Moscow, Izd-vo «Ves mir» (in Russian).
11. Neklessa, A., 1999. Konets tsivilizatsii ili zigzag istorii [The end of civilization or the zigzag of history]. Postindustrialnyiy mir: Tsentr, Periferiya, Rossiya. Sb. 1. Moscow, MONF; IMEMO RAN, 43 (in Russian).
12. Reznik, Yu. M., 2003. Globalnoe grazhdanskoe obschestvo [Global civil society]. Globalistika: Entsiklopediya. Moscow, Raduga, 1328 (in Russian).
13. Spivak, V. M. Global‌ne gromadyans‌ke suspil‌stvo: realiï ta may‌̆butnye [Global Civil Society: Realities and Future]. Аccess: http://archive. nbuv. gov. ua/portal/ soc_gum/Vdakk/2010_1/34. pdf (in Ukrainian).
14. Shajgorods‌ky‌j, Yu., 2013. Gromadyans‌ke suspil‌stvo v Ukrayini: chy‌nny‌ky‌ j osobly‌vosti formuvannya [Civil society in Ukraine: the factors and features of formation]. Suchasna ukrayins‌ka polity‌ka 28, 323—334. Kyiv, Centr social‌ny‌x komunikacij (in Ukrainian).
15. Shapovalova, A. M., 2009. Global‌ne gromadyans‌ke suspil‌stvo yak chy‌nny‌k formuvannya ukrayins‌koyi samovryadnosti [Global civil society as a factor in the formation of Ukrainian self-government]. Osvita regionu. Politologiya, psy‌xologiya, komunikaciyi 1, 57-60 (in Ukrainian).
16. Shepelyev, M., 2013. Global‌ne gromadyans‌ke suspil‌stvo yak koncept i social‌na real‌nist‌ [Global civil society as a concept and social reality]. Visny‌k L‌vivs‌kogo universy‌tetu. Seriya: Mizhnarodni vidnosy‌ny‌ 33, 25-38. Аccess: (in Ukrainian).
17. Ettsioni, Amitai, 2004. Ot imperii k soobschestvu: novyiy podhod k mezhdunarodnyim otnosheniyam [From empire to community: a new approach to international relations]. Moscow, Nauchno-izdatelskiy tsentr «Ladomir» (in Russian).
18. Anheier, Н., Meghanad, Desai, Glasius, М„ Kaldor, М., Keane, J., Naghton, J., Osgood, D., Pianta, M., Pinter, F., Said, Yahia, 2001.. Global Civil Society: 2001 / Gidens A. (Foreword). Oxford Univ.Press (in English).
19. Barber, Benjamin, R., 2000. «Globalizing Democracy» in: American Prospect, September 11, 16 (in English).
20. Camilireri, J. A., 1998. The UN’s Place in the Era of Globalization: A Four-Dimensional Perspective. Between Sovereignty and Global Covernance: The UN, the State and Civil Society. Houndmills; N.Y. etc. 344 (in English).
21. Bull, H., 1997. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 329
(in English).
22. Global Civil Society: Yearbook 2001. Oxford. 2001 (in English).
23. Global Civil Society: Yearbook 2011. Oxford. 2011. Аccess: (in English).
24. Governance in a Globalizing World. Ed. By Joseph S. Nye Jr. and John D. Donahue. Brookings Institution Press. Washington D. C. 2000 (in English).
25. Keohane, R. О., 1998. International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work? Foreign Policy. Spring 110, 92-94 (in English).
26. Marchetti Rafaelle, Global civil society, 2017. International relations edited by Stephen Mc Glinchey, E-International relation Publishing, Bristol, England. ISBN 978-1-910814-17-8 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-910814-18-5 (e-book), 78-86 Аccess: (in English).
27. McKinney, Michael, L., and Schoch, Robert, M., 2003. Environmental Science Systems and Solutions, Boston: Jones & Barlett(in English).
28. Modelskyi, Dj., 2001. Global Civil Society. Yearbook. - 2001; Oxford (in English).
29. Nuscheier, F., 1998. Global Governance versus Superpower Governance. Internationale Politik 11 (in English).
30. Polanyi, К., 1957. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston (in English).
31. Rosenau, James N., and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, (eds.), 1992. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Ithaca (NY), London: Cornell University Press (in English).
32. Sassen, S., 1996. Losing Control?; Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. N.Y. (in English).
33. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad (англ.), Fareed Zakaria, (W.W. Norton & Company; 2003) ISBN 0-393-04764-4 (in English).
34. Young, Oran, R., 1996. Governance in World Affairs, Gordenker, Leon (eds.) NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance, Boulder (Co.), London: Lynne Rienner Publishers (in English).
How to Cite
Kvitka, S. (2017). Global civil society: between nation states and transnational corporations. Public Administration Aspects, 5(3-4), 65-76.