Humanization of the civil service in the context of the European integration of Ukraine


  • O. A. Lyndyuk National academy for public administration under the president of Ukraine
Keywords: civil service, humanism, humanization of civil service, humanistic values of civil service, the European integration

Abstract

European integration of Ukraine requires new philosophy of governance modernization and organization, an effective functioning of the civil service system. The urgency of the implementation of humanization approach is a priority for modernization of the national civil service system. The problem of humanization of the civil service in the context of the European integration of Ukraine has been studied in the article. The essence of concepts of «humanism» and «humanization of the civil service» has been considered. Humanism is understood as reflected anthropocentrism, with the human being the object with the highest value. The term «humanization of the civil service» means a deliberate reorientation of the civil service and its objects to recognize a human as an absolute value, «a measure of all things» and to meet the vital needs of society, creating conditions for its full self-realization and ensuring sustainable human development. The civil service must guarantee the security and stability of life and protect rights, freedoms and interests of each individual. Humanization of civil service is also determined as strengthening the rights and freedoms of civil servants, special protection of their dignity and the formation of new humanistic principles of civil service. The features of humanization of the national civil service have been analyzed. It has been found that the human is considered to be the highest value and the content and direction of civil servants activity is determined by ensuring his rights and freedoms. The necessity of changing the priorities of civil service modernization on the basis of humanization, orientation on meeting the needs of human and citizen, as well as creating conditions for closer implementation of national civil service standards to those used in the European Union has been proved. Changes in the philosophy of the civil service of Ukraine should be directed to «serving people», functioning of «service state» has to be focused on the outcome and quality of service. Being system determinants of civil service, it is necessary to follow the absolute value of human, structural and functional changes in the system. Modernization of the civil service in compliance with the European standards which are based on the humanization concept is possible by working out the own paradigm of civil service humanization and the development of national model of «civil service for people» that will integrate problematic analysis of the rights and freedoms at all levels of authority, provide humanization of social relations and will generate real standards of the Ukrainian state development.

References

1. Humanizatsiya derzhavnoyi sluzhby [Humanization of civil service]. 2011. Entsyklopediya derzhavnoho upravlinnya. NADU, Kyiv, Ukraine. 93–94 (in Ukrainian).
2. Ivanov, S., Integral’nyj gumanizm kak ideologija prav cheloveka. [Integral humanism as an ideology of human rights]. Access: http:/ /www.dopfo.ru/?num=33&id=451 (in Russian)
3. Kazantsev, N., 1992. Sotsial’na derzhava: vlada i upravlinnya [The welfare state: the power and administration]. Problemy teoriyi i praktyky upravlinnya 5, 84 (in Ukrainian).
4. Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny [Constitution of Ukraine]. 1996. Access: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80 (in Ukrainian).
5. Markov, B.F. Nytsshe y humanizm [Nietzsche and gumanіzm]. Access: http://libelli.ru/works/nizhum.htm (in Ukrainian).
6. Nyzhnyk, N.R., Pashko, L.A., 2005. Upravlins’ka kul’tura: teoretychne ponyattya chy upravlins’ka povedinka? [Management culture: a theoretical concept or governance behavior?]. Politychnyy menedzhment 5, 105–111 (in Ukrainian).
7. Obolonskij, A.V., 2011. Krizis bjurokraticheskogo gosudarstva: reformy gosudarstvennoj sluzhby: mezhdunarodnyj opyt i rossijskie reali [Bureaucratic state crisis: Civil service reform: International experience and Russian reality]. Fond «Liberal’naja missija», Moscow (in Russian)
8. Petrovs’kyy, P.M., 2008. Humanitarna paradyhma v systemi derzhavnoho upravlinnya [Humanitarian paradigm in public administration]. LRIDU NADU, L’viv (in Ukrainian).
9. Pro Kontseptsiyu adaptatsiyi instytutu derzhavnoyi sluzhby v Ukrayini do standartiv Yevropeys’koho Soyuzu [On the Concept of adaptation of civil service in Ukraine to EU standards]. 2004. Holos, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
10. Pushkar, O., Bashtannyk, V., 2013. Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady doslidzhennya humanizatsiynoho kontseptu yak fenomenu suspil’nykh vidnosyn v umovakh modernizatsiyi derzhavnoho upravlinnya [Theoretical and methodological principles of the investigation of the humanization concept as a phenomenon of public relations in the context of public administration modernization]. Derzhavne upravlinnya ta mistseve samovryaduvannya 1, 3–11 (in Ukrainian).
11. Rychko, O.V., 2013. Humanizatsiya derzhavnoho upravlinnya v Ukrayini : problemy ta perspektyvy [Humanization of public administration in Ukraine: рroblems and рrospects]. Ekonomika ta derzhava 12, 141–144 (in Ukrainian).
12. Mykhnenkо, A.M., Bakumenko, V.D., 2006. Upravlinnya suspil’nym rozvytkom [Management of social development]. Vyd-vo NADU, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
13. Nadol’nyy, I.F., Andrushchenko, V.P., Boychenko, I.V., 1998. Filosofiya [Рhilosophy]. Vikar, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
14. Andrushchenko, V.P., 2003. Filosofiya polityky [Рhilosophy of politics]. Znannya Ukrayiny, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
15. Fromm, Je., 1990. Imet’ ili byt’? [Have or to be?]. Progress, Moscow (in Russian)
16. Kliksberg, B., 1994. The «Necessary» state: agenda for discussion. International review of administrative science 60(2), 183–196.
Published
2017-03-14
How to Cite
Lyndyuk, O. (2017). Humanization of the civil service in the context of the European integration of Ukraine. Public Administration Aspects, 4(11-12), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.15421/15201661
Section
Personnel policy and public service