Chronopolitics: methodological aspects of public policy research


  • O. A. Zubchyk aras Shevchenko Kyiv national university
Keywords: Chronopolitics, educational policy, political time multi-temporal political processes, bifurcation, fragmigration

Abstract

The methodology of Chronopolitics has been studied. It can be useful for Public administration. Experts understand Chronopolitics as changes in market conditions, aimed at setting and achieving political goals (V. Tsymburskyy); distribution and redistribution of social time (A. Panarin); form a combination of socio-cultural and political time (V. Vasilenko); time dimension of political activity (Semenov); objectivity (M. Ozhevan, S. Datsyuk and B. Granovsky); subjectivity, “сhrono strategy” of state (B. Parahonskyy); Radical social transformation (W. Capito); multi-temporal processes of policy (D. Gorin).The essence of the concept “Chronopolitics” has been comprehended as a form reflecting the time aspect of political transformation in the context of educational policy. Сhronopolitics is a set of studies on the heterogeneity of the historical and political time. Consequently сhronopolitics is: 1) simulation of unidirectional process stages in the history of societies, 2) analysis of cyclical trends or waves in different areas of society.The term “Chronopolitics” was firstly used by french explorer P. Virilyo. Also, the term “Chronopolitics” was used by Modelsky. A. Panarin explained the understanding of time in the “methodological presumption global political forecasting” as the uncertainty of the future. According to Rosenau, this is qualitatively different future. It has been proven that states are not the main subjects. The main actors are individuals. They enter into a relationship with each other under conditions of mediation. Rosenau suggested that in the historical development of mankind there have been structural changes which inevitably increase the interdependence of peoples and societies, causing a radical transformation in international relations. The modern world is a “world of the individual”. In this world, a person interacts with other people and groups at the macro and micro social space. But the development is not achieved by means of expenses of the different countries of the global world. This classification includes developed countries, developing countries, the least developed countries.Global leader has a special task. In terms of polarity global world leader has to implement a policy of inclusive development (Boutros Boutros-Ghali). The main objective of the global leader is to counter fragmentation. Global Leadership is aimed at achieving the global progress in science, education and technology. Therefore, it is important advanced research, which shows opportunities of the policy and practice of “reasonable force” in international and domestic politics (D. Kalachov, M. Lebedev, A. Panov, A. Torkunov, A. Stoletov, I. Chiharyev). “Smart power” is based on the expert, diplomatic, scientific, educational, innovation and technology, military and discursive resources.Discussions on the subject, methods and basic categories of Chronopolitics are consequently continuing. Chronopolitics includes various different problems for research. Chronopolitics provides opportunities for the education policy analysis, which is an analysis of political institutions and processes through the category of political time.Chronopolitics has enriched significantly the science and practice of policy analysis. This is the theoretical and methodological basis for the deployment of the suggested research in various areas of political life. It is necessary to extend field studies of political dynamics in modern political science, study the multi-temporal political processes, especially on the basis of the analysis of educational policy. The science of public administration can use these capabilities of methodology of Chronopolitics.Chronopolitics as methodology examines the role of the state in the political structure of the political entity in temporal conditions of political and administrative decisions. These issues have been discussed in the context of Chronopolitical study of historical forms of political organization. The study has proved that Chronopolitics functionally and structurally adds the conceptual and categorical apparatus of political sciences, science and public administration.

References

1. Aron R., 1984. Paix et Guerre entre les nations. Paris, (in English).
2. Aron R., 1963. Une Sociologie des relations intemationales// Revue firancaise de sociologie. 1963. Vol. IV. №3 (in Spanish).
3. Boutros Ghali B., Gosovic B., 2011. Global leadership and global systemic issues: South, North and the United Nations in a 21 Century World. May, 2011, 58 (in English).
4. Lokkesmoe K.J., 2009. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. June, 2009 (in English).
5. Modelski G., 1995. From leadership to organization: The evolution of global politics / G. Modelski // Journal of World Systems Research. Vol. 1, 7, 53-93 (in English).
6. Modelski G., 1987. Long Cycles in World Politics. Seattle (in English).
7. Modelski G., 1987. The Study of Long Cycles. Seattle (in English).
8. Modelski G., 1996. Time, Calendars and International Relations: Evolution of Global Politics in the 21st Century. Materials of the 37th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association. San Diego University Press, San Diego, April 16-20 (in English).
9. Rosenau J.N., 1990. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. N.J. (in English).
10. Rosenau J.X., 1979. Le touriste et le terroriste on les deux extremes du continuntinternational. Etudes intemationales, 1979. Juin, 220 (in Francs).
11. Andrushhenko M. O., 2011. Osoblyvosti suchasnyh koncepcij hronopolityky: avtoref. dys ... kand. polit. nauk [Features of the modern concepts of Chronopolitics: Author. Thesis ... candidate. flight. Science]. Kyi’v, (in Ukrainian).
12. Andrushhenko M.O., 2009. Koncepcija hronopolityky Polja Viril’jo: vid dromokratii’ do dromologii’ [The concept of Chronopolitics by Paul Virilio: from dromocracy to dromology]. Politologichnyj visnyk. Zb-k nauk. prac’, Kyiv 41, 143-151 (in Ukrainian).
13. Vallerstajn I., 2001. Izobretenie real’nostej vremeni-prostranstva: k ponimaniju nashih istoricheskih system [The invention of time-space realities: to the understanding of our historical systems]. Vremja mira: Al’manah sovremennyh issledovanij no teoreticheskoj istorii makrosociologii, geopolitike, analizu mirovyh sistem i civilizacij. Vyp.2: Struktury istorii, Novosibirsk, 102-116 (in Russian).
14. Vasilenko I.A., 1997. Politicheskoe vremja na rubezhe kul’tur [The political time on the edge of the cultures]. Voprosy filosofii, 9, 46-57 (in Russian).
15. Gorin D. M., 2015. Metodologii hronopolitiki: politemporal’nost’ politicheskih processov i institucional’nye rezhimy [Methodologies of Chronopolitics: politemporal political processes and institutional regimes]. Srednerusskij vestnik obshhestvennyh nauk, 4, 65-72 (in Russian).
16. Dacjuk S., 1999. Geopolitika, hronopolitika i kul’turopolitika Ukrainy [Geopolitics, Chronopolitics and cultural politycs of Ukraine]. Zerkalo nedeli, 16 janv., 11 (in Russian).
17. Kapіton, V. P., 2002. Hronopolіtika: mіf chi real’nіst’ [The Chronopolitics: Myth or Reality]. Granі, 5, 102 – 111 (in Ukrainian).
18. Lebedeva M. M., 2009. Vysshee obrazovanie kak potencial «mjagkoj sily» Rossii [Higher education as a potential “soft power” of Russia]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Moscow, 6, 200-205 (in Russian).
19. Model’ski Dzh., 2006. Jevoljucija global’noj politiki [The evolution of global politics]. Mirovoj politicheskij processor, Moscow (in Russian).
20. Obrazovanie kak instrument «mjagkoj sily» i «umnoj vlasti» vo vneshnej politike Rossii [Education as an instrument of “soft power” and “smart power” in Russian foreign policy], 2012. Sbornik materialov Nauchno-jekspertnogo soveta pri Predsedatele Soveta Federacii na temu «Sovremennye zadachi politicheskogo, social’nogo i jekonomicheskogo razvitija Rossijskogo gosudarstva. Rol’ i mesto Soveta Federacii», 24.04.2012, Moskow (in Russian).
21. Ozhevan M. 2006. Ukraїns’ka nacіonal’na іdeja ta kul’turopolіtika nazdoganjajuchoї modernіzacії [Ukrainian national idea and cultural politycs’ catch-up modernization], Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
22. Panarin A., 2002. Znaete li vy, chto takoe hronopolitika [Do you know what is Chronopolitics], Moscow (in Russian).
23. Panova E. P., 2001. Vysshee obrazovanie kak potencial mjagkoj vlasti gosudarstva [Higher education as a potential “soft power” of the state]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Moscow, 2, 157-161 (in Russian).
24. Parahons’kij B., 2005. Mіsce і rol’ Ukraїni v suchasnomu geopolіtichnomu prostorі [The place and role of Ukraine in a modern geopolitical space]. Kyiv (in Russian).
25. Semenov S., 1993. Hronopoliticheskie aspekty krizisov kul’tury [Chronopolitics aspects of cultural crises]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 4, 146 – 159 (in Russian).
26. Stoletov O. V., 2014. Strategija “razumnoj sily” v politike global’nogo liderstva: dissertacija na soiskanie nauchnoj stepeni kandidata politicheskih nauk: 23.00.04 [The strategy of “reasonable force” in policy of global leadership: the dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of candidate of political sciences: 23.00.04]. Moscow, 263 (in Russian).
27. Stoletov O. V., Chiharev I. A., Kalachev D. N., 2014. Universitety kak sub’ekty publichnoj diplomatii [Universities as a public diplomacy actors]. ALMA MATER, Moscow, 12, 10-18 (in Russian).
28. Torkunov A. V., 2013. Obrazovanie kak instrument «mjagkoj sily» vo vneshnej politike Rossii. Rossijskij sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam [Education as an instrument of “soft power” in Russian foreign policy]. Moscow (in Russian).
29. Cymburskij V., 2000. Skol’ko civilizacij? (C Lamanskim, Shpenglerom i Tojnbi nad globusom XXI veka) [How many civilizations? (C Lamanskii, Spengler and Toynbee on the globe of the XXI century)]. Pro et Contra, 5, 3, 173-197 (in Russian).
30. Chiharev I. A., 2005. Hronopolitika: razvitie issledovatel’skoj paradigmy [Chronopolitics: the development of research paradigm]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija, 3, 21-33 (in Russian).
31. Chiharev I. A., 2003. Hronopolitika v teoreticheskih issledovanijah mirovoj politiki: dis. … kand. polit. nauk: 23.00.02 [Chronopolitics in theoretical studies of world politics]. MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, Moscow, 150 (in Russian).
Published
2016-08-12
How to Cite
Zubchyk, O. (2016). Chronopolitics: methodological aspects of public policy research. Public Administration Aspects, 4(9-10), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.15421/152016846
Section
Theory and history of public administration